VetMyAddress
Sample Full Address Profile
123 Maple Ridge Lane, Demonstration City, NC 27514
Demonstration data only
This is a sample profile using demonstration data.
It shows the type of context unlocked after payment. It is not about a real property and should not be used for a real estate, health, legal, or insurance decision.
Overall public-record signal
Mostly favorable, with items to review
Grade scale
Pollution & Cleanup is the section to review — a cleanup site inside 1 mile, plus tank and lead-era context · PFAS shows one compound above the 4 ppt level · Air is good but the county is radon Zone 1 (worth a $15 test) · Flood risk is low · Water shows monitoring-type items only.
How to read this profile
Use this as a public-record screen, not a safety rating. A lower grade means one category has records worth looking into — not that the home is unsafe. Use the source links to verify each finding directly.
Category snapshot
This is the same grade summary users see before unlock, followed here by the premium detail below.
Pollution & Cleanup Sites
Worth reviewingFlood & Natural Hazard
Lower concernDrinking Water
Lower concernForever Chemicals (PFAS)
Worth reviewingAir Quality
Lower concernTop things to review
Unlocked full context
Worth reviewing
Nearby cleanup records are worth reviewing in context
The sample pollution section shows how the full profile explains proximity, cleanup status, and what the public record does and does not prove.
Next thing to verify: Open the official EPA site record and check current cleanup status, listed contaminants, and whether residential exposure is mentioned.
Worth reviewing
Water records should be checked at the utility level
The full profile explains why water data belongs to a service area and gives the user the next verification step instead of implying the tap water was tested.
Next thing to verify: Confirm the utility name and review its latest Consumer Confidence Report.
Worth reviewing
PFAS compounds were detected in the matched water system's federal testing
The full profile lists the detected compounds, what the reported levels mean against EPA reference values, and how a nearby military installation with a history of AFFF use fits into the picture — especially for properties on private wells.
Next thing to verify: Open the serving utility's PFAS results page or latest Consumer Confidence Report and check the current levels for the detected compounds.
1Pollution & Cleanup Sites
Cleanup sites weighed by distance — one in the closer ring, the rest as context
Worth reviewingC
Pollution & Cleanup Sites
Cleanup sites weighed by distance — one in the closer ring, the rest as context
The sample profile shows how nearby cleanup records are weighed by distance, not just counted. Sites within one mile carry the most weight; those out to three miles are context. A finding like this does not prove exposure at the home, but it is worth reviewing.
Superfund / cleanup sites (tiered by distance)
1 within 1 mile (0.8 mi) · 3 more in the 1–3 mile context ring
Worth reviewing
Superfund / cleanup sites (tiered by distance)
1 within 1 mile (0.8 mi) · 3 more in the 1–3 mile context ring
The closest EPA-tracked cleanup site sits inside the 1-mile primary ring, so it drives this category's grade; the others fall in the 1–3 mile context ring and are weighted lower. The full profile names each site, flags whether any is on the National Priorities List, and links the EPA record.
Leaking / underground storage tanks within 1 mile
2 LUST records · 5 active tank facilities
Worth reviewing
Leaking / underground storage tanks within 1 mile
2 LUST records · 5 active tank facilities
Leaking underground storage tank (LUST) records are often former gas stations or dry cleaners. Within a quarter mile they are worth reviewing for soil and groundwater; the full profile shows the distance tier for each and links the state cleanup file.
Regulated facilities within 1 mile
8 facilities
Typical for this county: ~4–11 within 1 mile · approximate county context
Lower concern
Regulated facilities within 1 mile
8 facilities
Typical for this county: ~4–11 within 1 mile · approximate county context
Regulated facilities are common in many urban and suburban areas. The profile separates ordinary permit presence from findings that deserve closer review.
Lead-paint-era housing (neighborhood context)
Tract built largely pre-1980
Worth reviewing
Lead-paint-era housing (neighborhood context)
Tract built largely pre-1980
Lead-based paint was banned for residential use in 1978, so a neighborhood built mostly before then is worth noting if the specific home is that era. This is Census tract-level context, not a test of this home — a ~$30 lead test kit or a certified inspection answers it for the property.
Next thing to verify
Open the closest EPA cleanup record and confirm the site status, listed contaminants, and whether residential exposure pathways are mentioned. If the home predates 1978, a lead test kit settles the paint question.
Demo sources: EPA Superfund (SEMS), EPA UST Finder, EPA ECHO, Census ACS. Actual reports include source freshness and address-match context.
2Flood & Natural Hazard
Federal flood data does not show the address in the highest-risk zone
Lower concernB
Flood & Natural Hazard
Federal flood data does not show the address in the highest-risk zone
The sample flood section shows how FEMA flood-zone signals are summarized without replacing lender, insurer, or surveyor determinations.
FEMA special flood hazard area
No match in demo data
Lower concern
FEMA special flood hazard area
No match in demo data
The demonstration address is not shown inside a Special Flood Hazard Area. This is a public-map screen, not a final insurance requirement decision.
Next thing to verify
Ask an insurance broker for a flood quote and confirm the property-specific map panel directly.
Demo source: FEMA NFHL. Actual reports may include flood-zone labels and source availability notes.
3Drinking Water
Matched utility record shows monitoring-type items in the sample data
Lower concernB
Drinking Water
Matched utility record shows monitoring-type items in the sample data
Water records are organized by utility service area, not individual home plumbing. The full profile explains the matched utility and how to verify current conditions.
Recent compliance violations
2 monitoring/reporting records
Worth reviewing
Recent compliance violations
2 monitoring/reporting records
Monitoring and reporting records can mean paperwork, sampling, or reporting issues rather than a confirmed contaminant exceedance. The full profile separates these from health-based violations when data is available.
Next thing to verify
Find the utility's latest Consumer Confidence Report and check whether any recent violations were health-based, unresolved, or tied to specific contaminants.
Demo source: EPA SDWIS. Actual reports explain when the water system cannot be auto-matched.
4Forever Chemicals (PFAS)
PFAS detected in the matched water system's federal testing
Worth reviewingC
Forever Chemicals (PFAS)
PFAS detected in the matched water system's federal testing
The PFAS section shows how the matched water system's federal testing results are translated into a grade. In this demonstration, UCMR 5 testing reported detections, and a nearby military installation with known PFAS history adds context.
UCMR 5 detections in matched water system
PFOA 6.2 ppt · PFBS 3.1 ppt (vs the 4 ppt federal action level)
Worth reviewing
UCMR 5 detections in matched water system
PFOA 6.2 ppt · PFBS 3.1 ppt (vs the 4 ppt federal action level)
The water system reported two PFAS compounds in its UCMR 5 federal testing — PFOA above and PFBS below the 4 ppt action level. Parts per trillion is a tiny unit (4 ppt is about one drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools), but PFOA over the level is worth reviewing. This is a utility-level record, not a measurement of the tap water inside this specific home.
DoD PFAS installations within 3 miles
1 installation
Worth reviewing
DoD PFAS installations within 3 miles
1 installation
A military installation with a history of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) use appears in the DoD PFAS disclosure list within 3 miles of the demo address. Combined with the water-system detections above, this proximity is a context signal the full profile explains in plain English.
Next thing to verify
Open the serving utility's PFAS results page (or its latest Consumer Confidence Report) to see current levels for the detected compounds, and confirm whether the address is on this public system or a private well.
Demo sources: EPA UCMR 5, DoD PFAS Installation Report. Actual reports note whether the water system was matched and whether it was required to test under UCMR 5.
5Air Quality
Recent regional air quality looks favorable in the sample profile
Lower concernA
Air Quality
Recent regional air quality looks favorable in the sample profile
AirNow readings are based on nearby monitoring conditions, not indoor air, mold, ventilation, or property-specific testing.
30-day average AQI
42 AQI
Lower concern
30-day average AQI
42 AQI
The demonstration data is in the Good range. Sensitive households may still want to check seasonal smoke, pollen, traffic, and indoor conditions.
EPA radon zone (county)
Zone 1 — highest predicted indoor radon potential
Worth reviewing
EPA radon zone (county)
Zone 1 — highest predicted indoor radon potential
This county is EPA radon Zone 1, the highest of three zones. Radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer, and a ~$15 test kit is the cheapest definitive answer in this whole report — it's the one risk you can confirm yourself in days. This is a county-level prediction, not a measurement of this home.
Next thing to verify
Review current AirNow conditions for the season you expect to move, especially for children, older adults, or asthma. Separately, run a ~$15 radon test kit — in a Zone 1 county it's the highest-value check here.
Demo sources: AirNow, EPA Map of Radon Zones. Actual reports include recent readings, geographic match notes, and the county radon zone.
For real estate agents
The same profile, wrapped in your branding — this is what your clients receive.
Prepared for the Rivera family by Jordan Avery · Avery Residential Group
Environmental Profile
123 Maple Ridge Lane, Demonstration City, NC 27514
Demonstration data only
Powered by VetMyAddress
How to read this profile
Each category gets an A–F grade summarizing what public environmental records show near this address — not an inspection of the home itself. Most properties carry at least one item worth reviewing; a C is common in many metrosand means “worth a closer look,” not “unsafe.” Every finding links to its official source and a specific next step, so anything flagged can be verified directly.
↑ Your cover note and grade summary · the full graded profile (above) renders here in your colors · your contact card below ↓
Questions about this profile?
Jordan Avery
Avery Residential Group
License #02XXXXXX
Environmental data verified by VetMyAddress · EPA · FEMA · AirNow · SDWIS
About this sample profile
Grades summarize public records from federal environmental databases. A-F grades reflect the presence, severity, and type of findings, not predictions of health outcomes or a determination that a property is safe or unsafe.
This profile is not a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, medical advice, legal advice, insurance determination, or real estate disclosure.
Run this on a real address
See your A–F grades free. Unlock the full profile for $19.99 — backed by a 7-day money-back guarantee.
- ✓5 graded categories across 8+ federal signals
- ✓Superfund with tiered distances + underground tanks
- ✓County radon zone + lead-paint-era housing context
- ✓County benchmarks — how your counts compare
- ✓Official source link + next step for every finding
- ✓Printable from your browser